In the April 2012 edition of the mighty National Geographic Magazine there is a small article titled Image Obsessed. According to consumer research digital photos taken by Americans have risen from 177 per person in 2006 to 255 in 2011; by 2015 it will have reached 322. I suspect a similar rising pattern can be attributed to British snappers. Ed Lee, photo services director at the market research firm says “not having to consider the cost of developing and printing has allowed people to be more creative” He also says “culling and keeping track of all those digital files takes time “Er, I don’t think so Ed.
The article also points out that 37% of photos were taken on smart phones and this could rise to near 50% by 2015.
I have a smart phone and occasionally snap something on it but to call these images creative would be stretching it a bit to say the least.
I ride to work along the seafront and most days there are two or three people snapping the sunrise over the pier. These people are dog walking or have popped out of a hotel for a smoke and by default have seen the sunrise and thought, ooh I’ll take a snap on my phone.
My colleague at work does this and then sticks the image up as a screen saver on the computer we share. The image changes every other week and the old one is just lost.
I took a snap with my phone of a lovely little street bike while out and about the other day. I posted it on Twitter as some of my mates like motorbikes too and that’s the end of it. It is now deleted and forgotten, and I can assure you completely uncreative and unremarkable. If I was being creative I would have hunted down the owner and asked him to bring the bike round the corner to the huge wall of graffiti, used that as a backdrop and set up my Canon and tripod for a series of great images.
You see Ed, it is highly unlikely that more than a couple of percent of those 80 billion total images are culled filed or creative.
The truth is there is just an obsession with sharing every nano second of our existences on social networking sites or completely removing the need for conversation from life. We are not being creative, we are addicted to crappy little devices that have completely stifled our creativity and willingness to learn or improve. Why get better when you can just wait until iphone 28 comes along.
How many gigs have you been to since the smart phone became obligatory where you can barely see the band for the sea of arms holding iphones aloft. The results will be grainy crap shots where the only way to identify the band will be to read the accompanying text under the picture when it appears on Facebook. creativity doesn’t come into it and I doubt that Tod Owyoung, Charli Homo and Paige Parsons are too worried about the threat from these i-talents. I will happily talk all day on the great gigs I have attended, effervescing on the sound, the crowd, the way Dave Grohl threatened to play drums again and of course telling stories and bigging it up a bit, but I have no accompanying images to sell my point. Now it’s just “here look. me at The Maccabees last night” “Oh yeah, nice” Conversation ends.
I have a friend who once posted 87 shots of Sunday on Facebook.
A friend told me a great story of a get together with mates for a good old fashioned beer and catch up. One mentioned a picture or app he had on his Facebook page and the others all immediately got there phones out, logged on and cooed over what ever it was and then they all liked it. I mean they hit the like button on FB!?!? They were all there, in the same room and rather than chat they social networked.
All those phone photos will be deleted for the next great shot or just die with the phone when it is upgraded and recycled to the African market. Why? because they are not creative or special, they are just throw away snaps from a file containing 87 shots of Sunday.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/paigekparsons/3595950524/sizes/o/in/photostream/








